TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Win percentage

Win percentage

Matches won, all levels, last five years. The plainest number here, and the one every other page assumes you already know.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Iga Swiatek
Leader

POLIga Swiatek

82.6% of matches won

Average
54.1%
Std. dev.
9.2
Leader sits at
3.1σ
Range
12.5 … 82.6
153 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
82.6%100.0357
2
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
77.5%99.3325
3
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
74.4%98.7305
4
SH
ROUSimona Halep
74.3%98.070
5
ER
Elena Ruse
74.0%97.473
6
Coco Gauff
USACoco Gauff#4
72.2%96.7316
7
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
71.6%96.1327
8
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
71.2%95.4222
9
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
70.7%94.7181
10
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
68.8%94.1208
11
Sonay Kartal
GBRSonay Kartal#124
68.3%93.4123
12
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
68.2%92.8173
13
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
68.0%92.1228
14
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
67.6%91.4145
15
MV
CZEMarketa Vondrousova#140
67.6%90.8145
16
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
67.2%90.1183
17
OJ
TUNOns Jabeur
66.3%89.5181
18
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
66.2%88.8145
19
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
66.0%88.2203
20
Sara Bejlek
CZESara Bejlek#38
64.0%87.5125
21
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
63.5%86.8167
22
Qinwen Zheng
CHNQinwen Zheng
63.4%86.2213
23
Anna Kalinskaya
RUSAnna Kalinskaya#21
62.7%85.5201
24
VA
BLRVictoria Azarenka
62.7%84.9150
25
Diana Shnaider
RUSDiana Shnaider#17
61.9%84.2202
26
Barbora Krejcikova
CZEBarbora Krejcikova#26
61.7%83.6193
27
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
61.0%82.9236
28
Maya Joint
AUSMaya Joint#75
60.6%82.2193
29
PK
CZEPetra Kvitova
60.2%81.6103
30
OD
SRBOlga Danilovic
60.2%80.9118
31
Jelena Ostapenko
LATJelena Ostapenko#29
60.2%80.3241
32
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
59.8%79.6194
33
Jasmine Paolini
ITAJasmine Paolini#15
59.6%78.9270
34
McCartney Kessler
USAMcCartney Kessler#48
59.5%78.3153
35
Emma Navarro
USAEmma Navarro#28
59.0%77.6210
36
CG
FRACaroline Garcia
58.5%77.0183
37
Emma Raducanu
GBREmma Raducanu#49
58.3%76.3156
38
Anastasia Potapova
AUTAnastasia Potapova#27
58.3%75.7223
39
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
58.0%75.0250
40
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
58.0%74.3169
41
Daria Kasatkina
AUSDaria Kasatkina#61
58.0%73.7276
42
Maria Sakkari
GREMaria Sakkari#33
57.9%73.0266
43
Marie Bouzkova
CZEMarie Bouzkova#25
57.9%72.4235
44
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
57.8%71.7192
45
Caty McNally
USACaty McNally
57.8%71.1154
46
CW
DENCaroline Wozniacki
57.6%70.433
47
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
57.6%69.7271
48
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
57.5%69.1221
49
Alexandra Eala
PHIAlexandra Eala#20
57.3%68.4199
50
Eva Lys
GEREva Lys#85
57.1%67.8140

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with a recorded score. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Five years of results. These rows need only the scoreline, which exists far further back than serve statistics do.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Straight-set wins →Bagels handed out →Set margin →