TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›1st serve points won

1st serve points won

Points won behind the first serve. The weapon at full power, before the opponent gets a look.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Elena Rybakina
Leader

KAZElena Rybakina

73.9% of first-serve points won

Average
64.3%
Std. dev.
3.5
Leader sits at
2.7σ
Range
55.9 … 73.9
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
73.9%100.0111
2
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
72.9%99.262
3
Qinwen Zheng
CHNQinwen Zheng
71.2%98.443
4
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
70.9%97.587
5
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
70.8%96.795
6
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
70.1%95.976
7
Lulu Sun
NZLLulu Sun#117
70.0%95.186
8
Rebeka Masarova
SUIRebeka Masarova
69.9%94.3104
9
Alycia Parks
USAAlycia Parks#71
69.7%93.4131
10
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
69.7%92.647
11
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
69.4%91.8104
12
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
69.4%91.099
13
Veronika Kudermetova
RUSVeronika Kudermetova#129
69.4%90.263
14
ER
Elena Ruse
68.7%89.366
15
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
68.6%88.5111
16
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
68.5%87.791
17
Robin Montgomery
USARobin Montgomery
68.5%86.959
18
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
68.3%86.1105
19
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
68.2%85.282
20
Coco Gauff
USACoco Gauff#4
67.9%84.493
21
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
67.9%83.693
22
Donna Vekic
CRODonna Vekic#35
67.8%82.861
23
Liudmila Samsonova
RUSLiudmila Samsonova#55
67.8%82.072
24
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
67.7%81.182
25
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
67.6%80.370
26
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
67.5%79.564
27
AP
RUSAnastasia Pavlyuchenkova
67.2%78.737
28
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
67.2%77.966
29
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
67.2%77.033
30
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
66.9%76.2112
31
BP
USABernarda Pera
66.9%75.465
32
PM
CROPetra Martic
66.6%74.639
33
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
66.6%73.864
34
Leylah Fernandez
CANLeylah Fernandez#34
66.5%73.081
35
Heather Watson
GBRHeather Watson
66.4%72.156
36
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
66.4%71.375
37
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
66.3%70.570
38
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
66.2%69.786
39
Wang Xinyu
CHNWang Xinyu#41
66.1%68.960
40
GM
BELGreet Minnen
66.1%68.091
41
XW
Xin Yu Wang
66.0%67.276
42
Kimberly Birrell
AUSKimberly Birrell#69
66.0%66.4118
43
Jelena Ostapenko
LATJelena Ostapenko#29
65.9%65.663
44
Ann Li
USAAnn Li#31
65.8%64.8105
45
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
65.6%63.9120
46
Tatjana Maria
GERTatjana Maria#80
65.4%63.196
47
Katerina Siniakova
CZEKaterina Siniakova#37
65.2%62.384
48
Magda Linette
POLMagda Linette#68
65.1%61.567
49
Ella Seidel
GERElla Seidel#105
65.1%60.7117
50
Anastasia Potapova
AUTAnastasia Potapova#27
64.8%59.870

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best servers →Hold percentage →Ace rate →2nd serve points won →Fewest double faults →