TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Break percentage

Break percentage

Share of return games broken. The mirror of hold, and the rarer skill.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Sara Bejlek
Leader

CZESara Bejlek

46.2% of return games broken

Average
35.7%
Std. dev.
3.8
Leader sits at
2.8σ
Range
28.5 … 46.2
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Sara Bejlek
CZESara Bejlek#38
46.2%100.086
2
Katie Volynets
USAKatie Volynets#91
44.5%99.2127
3
ER
Elena Ruse
44.1%98.466
4
Coco Gauff
USACoco Gauff#4
43.3%97.593
5
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
42.9%96.799
6
Daria Kasatkina
AUSDaria Kasatkina#61
42.6%95.962
7
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESPSara Sorribes Tormo
42.1%95.152
8
XW
Xiyu Wang
41.4%94.369
9
Eva Lys
GEREva Lys#85
41.2%93.489
10
Viktorija Golubic
SUIViktorija Golubic#51
41.0%92.6101
11
Elina Avanesyan
ARMElina Avanesyan
40.7%91.855
12
Harriet Dart
GBRHarriet Dart#144
40.4%91.094
13
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
BLRAliaksandra Sasnovich#141
40.1%90.2119
14
Zeynep Sonmez
TURZeynep Sonmez#52
40.1%89.3115
15
Emiliana Arango
COLEmiliana Arango#97
40.1%88.5111
16
Camila Osorio
COLCamila Osorio#60
40.1%87.783
17
Katerina Siniakova
CZEKaterina Siniakova#37
39.8%86.984
18
Anhelina Kalinina
UKRAnhelina Kalinina#54
39.7%86.168
19
JN
GERJule Niemeier
39.7%85.272
20
Alexandra Eala
PHIAlexandra Eala#20
39.7%84.4120
21
MS
CANMarina Stakusic#145
39.6%83.682
22
Caty McNally
USACaty McNally
39.5%82.885
23
SE
ITASara Errani
39.3%82.037
24
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
39.3%81.193
25
Maya Joint
AUSMaya Joint#75
39.3%80.3112
26
Marie Bouzkova
CZEMarie Bouzkova#25
39.0%79.572
27
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
38.9%78.764
28
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
38.8%77.987
29
Renata Zarazua
MEXRenata Zarazua#73
38.8%77.0125
30
SV
Sachia Vickery
38.7%76.236
31
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
ESPJessica Bouzas Maneiro#63
38.7%75.493
32
Lin Zhu
CHNLin Zhu
38.4%74.655
33
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
38.4%73.882
34
Yuliia Starodubtseva
UKRYuliia Starodubtseva#65
38.3%73.0123
35
Anna Blinkova
RUSAnna Blinkova#108
38.3%72.189
36
ZB
CHNZhuoxuan Bai
38.2%71.332
37
Cristina Bucsa
ESPCristina Bucsa#40
37.7%70.598
38
Jelena Ostapenko
LATJelena Ostapenko#29
37.6%69.763
39
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
37.6%68.9104
40
Emma Navarro
USAEmma Navarro#28
37.6%68.081
41
Claire Liu
USAClaire Liu#116
37.5%67.276
42
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
37.5%66.486
43
DS
AUSDaria Saville
37.4%65.647
44
Suzan Lamens
NEDSuzan Lamens#148
37.4%64.8109
45
LF
CZELinda Fruhvirtova
37.4%63.9106
46
MT
ITAMartina Trevisan
37.3%63.151
47
Jasmine Paolini
ITAJasmine Paolini#15
37.3%62.380
48
VT
BULViktoriya Tomova
37.1%61.576
49
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
37.0%60.7105
50
Anastasia Zakharova
RUSAnastasia Zakharova#99
36.9%59.8119

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best returners →Break points converted →