TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Break points saved

Break points saved

Break points survived. The serve that shows up when it is needed rather than on 40-0.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Elena Rybakina
Leader

KAZElena Rybakina

65.4% of break points saved

Average
55.8%
Std. dev.
3.1
Leader sits at
3.1σ
Range
49.1 … 65.4
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
65.4%100.0111
2
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
65.0%99.2104
3
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
64.7%98.464
4
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
62.5%97.564
5
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
62.3%96.782
6
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
60.5%95.993
7
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
60.5%95.166
8
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
60.3%94.3112
9
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
59.9%93.475
10
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
59.7%92.6105
11
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
59.6%91.8111
12
Leylah Fernandez
CANLeylah Fernandez#34
59.5%91.081
13
Robin Montgomery
USARobin Montgomery
59.3%90.259
14
OD
SRBOlga Danilovic
59.3%89.375
15
Diana Shnaider
RUSDiana Shnaider#17
59.3%88.591
16
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
59.3%87.776
17
Rebeka Masarova
SUIRebeka Masarova
59.3%86.9104
18
Lulu Sun
NZLLulu Sun#117
59.2%86.186
19
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
59.1%85.286
20
PM
CROPetra Martic
59.0%84.439
21
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
58.9%83.695
22
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
58.9%82.8120
23
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
58.8%82.062
24
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
58.8%81.133
25
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
58.7%80.387
26
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
58.5%79.570
27
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
58.4%78.787
28
Emma Raducanu
GBREmma Raducanu#49
58.3%77.961
29
BP
USABernarda Pera
58.1%77.065
30
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
58.1%76.291
31
Caroline Dolehide
USACaroline Dolehide
58.0%75.464
32
Katerina Siniakova
CZEKaterina Siniakova#37
58.0%74.684
33
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
57.9%73.899
34
Anhelina Kalinina
UKRAnhelina Kalinina#54
57.6%73.068
35
Katie Volynets
USAKatie Volynets#91
57.5%72.1127
36
GM
BELGreet Minnen
57.3%71.391
37
Kamilla Rakhimova
UZBKamilla Rakhimova#83
56.9%70.5128
38
Marie Bouzkova
CZEMarie Bouzkova#25
56.9%69.772
39
Anastasia Potapova
AUTAnastasia Potapova#27
56.9%68.970
40
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
56.8%68.070
41
Ann Li
USAAnn Li#31
56.7%67.2105
42
Jaqueline Cristian
ROMJaqueline Cristian#39
56.7%66.498
43
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
ITAElisabetta Cocciaretto#59
56.6%65.693
44
XW
Xin Yu Wang
56.4%64.876
45
Liudmila Samsonova
RUSLiudmila Samsonova#55
56.4%63.972
46
Wang Xinyu
CHNWang Xinyu#41
56.3%63.160
47
Nao Hibino
JPNNao Hibino
56.3%62.3106
48
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
56.3%61.547
49
Donna Vekic
CRODonna Vekic#35
56.2%60.761
50
Peyton Stearns
USAPeyton Stearns#57
56.2%59.873

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Tiebreak record →Deciding sets →Comebacks →Closing out →