TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Ace rate

Ace rate

Aces per 100 serve points — not per match. Per match rewards whoever plays longer matches.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Elena Rybakina
Leader

KAZElena Rybakina

9.5 aces per 100 serve points

Average
3.9
Std. dev.
2.1
Leader sits at
2.7σ
Range
0.3 … 9.5
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
9.5100.0111
2
Alycia Parks
USAAlycia Parks#71
9.399.2131
3
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
9.098.495
4
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
8.897.562
5
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
8.896.787
6
Qinwen Zheng
CHNQinwen Zheng
8.895.943
7
Lulu Sun
NZLLulu Sun#117
7.995.186
8
Robin Montgomery
USARobin Montgomery
7.494.359
9
Rebeka Masarova
SUIRebeka Masarova
7.493.4104
10
Veronika Kudermetova
RUSVeronika Kudermetova#129
7.392.663
11
BP
USABernarda Pera
6.991.865
12
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
6.891.076
13
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
6.890.264
14
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
6.789.391
15
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
6.488.5112
16
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
6.487.747
17
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
6.386.9111
18
Tatjana Maria
GERTatjana Maria#80
6.186.196
19
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
6.185.2104
20
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
5.884.433
21
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
5.883.682
22
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
5.882.870
23
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
5.782.0120
24
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
5.681.166
25
PM
CROPetra Martic
5.480.339
26
ER
Elena Ruse
5.479.566
27
Ashlyn Krueger
USAAshlyn Krueger#58
5.478.786
28
Ann Li
USAAnn Li#31
5.277.9105
29
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
5.277.086
30
Magda Linette
POLMagda Linette#68
5.276.267
31
Liudmila Samsonova
RUSLiudmila Samsonova#55
5.075.472
32
Jelena Ostapenko
LATJelena Ostapenko#29
5.074.663
33
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
4.973.882
34
Donna Vekic
CRODonna Vekic#35
4.973.061
35
AP
RUSAnastasia Pavlyuchenkova
4.872.137
36
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
4.871.399
37
XW
Xin Yu Wang
4.870.576
38
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
4.769.770
39
Elena-Gabriela Ruse
ROMElena-Gabriela Ruse#77
4.768.940
40
Wang Xinyu
CHNWang Xinyu#41
4.768.060
41
Rebecca Sramkova
SVKRebecca Sramkova#143
4.767.295
42
Peyton Stearns
USAPeyton Stearns#57
4.566.473
43
Emma Raducanu
GBREmma Raducanu#49
4.565.661
44
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
4.464.8105
45
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
4.463.964
46
LF
CZELinda Fruhvirtova
4.463.1106
47
Heather Watson
GBRHeather Watson
4.462.356
48
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
4.361.593
49
OD
SRBOlga Danilovic
4.260.775
50
BA
CANBianca Andreescu
4.159.847

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best servers →Hold percentage →1st serve points won →2nd serve points won →Fewest double faults →