TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Best servers

Best servers

Serve points won per 100 above what the rest of the tour manages against the same opponents. A ranking of aces measures the schedule; this measures the server.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Elena Rybakina
Leader

KAZElena Rybakina

+8.0 points per 100 serve points above the tour

Average
1.8
Std. dev.
1.9
Leader sits at
3.3σ
Range
-2.5 … 8.0
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
+8.0100.0111
2
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
+6.599.2104
3
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
+5.598.499
4
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
+5.497.587
5
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
+5.496.762
6
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
+5.195.9105
7
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
+5.095.164
8
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
+4.894.395
9
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
+4.393.466
10
Rebeka Masarova
SUIRebeka Masarova
+4.392.6104
11
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
+4.291.882
12
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
+4.291.076
13
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
+4.290.293
14
Robin Montgomery
USARobin Montgomery
+4.089.359
15
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
+4.088.5112
16
Lulu Sun
NZLLulu Sun#117
+4.087.786
17
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
+4.086.9111
18
Sonay Kartal
GBRSonay Kartal#124
+3.986.166
19
Veronika Kudermetova
RUSVeronika Kudermetova#129
+3.985.263
20
ER
Elena Ruse
+3.784.466
21
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
+3.783.686
22
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
+3.782.870
23
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
+3.582.082
24
GM
BELGreet Minnen
+3.581.191
25
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
+3.480.375
26
Leylah Fernandez
CANLeylah Fernandez#34
+3.379.581
27
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
+3.278.791
28
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
+3.177.9120
29
XW
Xin Yu Wang
+3.077.076
30
Qinwen Zheng
CHNQinwen Zheng
+3.076.243
31
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
+3.075.447
32
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
+3.074.670
33
Shuai Zhang
CHNShuai Zhang
+2.873.882
34
PM
CROPetra Martic
+2.873.039
35
Anna Kalinskaya
RUSAnna Kalinskaya#21
+2.872.171
36
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
+2.771.364
37
OD
SRBOlga Danilovic
+2.770.575
38
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
+2.769.787
39
Wang Xinyu
CHNWang Xinyu#41
+2.568.960
40
Liudmila Samsonova
RUSLiudmila Samsonova#55
+2.568.072
41
Caroline Dolehide
USACaroline Dolehide
+2.567.264
42
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
ITAElisabetta Cocciaretto#59
+2.566.493
43
Diana Shnaider
RUSDiana Shnaider#17
+2.465.691
44
XW
Xiyu Wang
+2.464.869
45
BA
CANBianca Andreescu
+2.463.947
46
Alycia Parks
USAAlycia Parks#71
+2.463.1131
47
Ann Li
USAAnn Li#31
+2.362.3105
48
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
+2.261.533
49
Katerina Siniakova
CZEKaterina Siniakova#37
+2.160.784
50
Lin Zhu
CHNLin Zhu
+2.159.855

How this is calculated

  • Opponent-adjusted. It is the excess over what the rest of the tour manages AGAINST THE SAME OPPONENTS, shrunk towards zero by n/(n+15). Without that adjustment the list rewards whoever never meets a good opponent: a Challenger regular topped the raw table.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Hold percentage →Ace rate →1st serve points won →2nd serve points won →Fewest double faults →