TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Hold percentage

Hold percentage

Share of service games held. The single number that decides how often a set reaches a tiebreak.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Elena Rybakina
Leader

KAZElena Rybakina

81.1% of service games held

Average
67.9%
Std. dev.
4.2
Leader sits at
3.1σ
Range
57.1 … 81.1
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
81.1%100.0111
2
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
78.9%99.2104
3
Iga Swiatek
POLIga Swiatek#8
75.5%98.499
4
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
75.3%97.562
5
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
75.0%96.7105
6
Linda Noskova
CZELinda Noskova#7
75.0%95.987
7
Clara Tauson
DENClara Tauson#30
74.8%95.195
8
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
74.7%94.364
9
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
74.3%93.466
10
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
74.0%92.682
11
Mirra Andreeva
RUSMirra Andreeva#5
73.6%91.893
12
Hailey Baptiste
USAHailey Baptiste#32
73.2%91.0111
13
Elise Mertens
BELElise Mertens#24
73.1%90.276
14
Madison Keys
USAMadison Keys#23
72.9%89.370
15
Amanda Anisimova
USAAmanda Anisimova#10
72.9%88.586
16
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
72.8%87.7112
17
Lulu Sun
NZLLulu Sun#117
72.8%86.986
18
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
72.7%86.175
19
Rebeka Masarova
SUIRebeka Masarova
72.6%85.2104
20
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
72.5%84.482
21
Robin Montgomery
USARobin Montgomery
72.1%83.659
22
Veronika Kudermetova
RUSVeronika Kudermetova#129
71.9%82.863
23
Leylah Fernandez
CANLeylah Fernandez#34
71.7%82.081
24
Ekaterina Alexandrova
RUSEkaterina Alexandrova#19
71.7%81.191
25
Sonay Kartal
GBRSonay Kartal#124
71.7%80.366
26
ER
Elena Ruse
71.5%79.566
27
GM
BELGreet Minnen
71.5%78.791
28
Qinwen Zheng
CHNQinwen Zheng
71.4%77.943
29
Diana Shnaider
RUSDiana Shnaider#17
70.9%77.091
30
Marta Kostyuk
UKRMarta Kostyuk#11
70.8%76.264
31
Anna Kalinskaya
RUSAnna Kalinskaya#21
70.7%75.471
32
OD
SRBOlga Danilovic
70.6%74.675
33
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
70.6%73.8120
34
Paula Badosa
ESPPaula Badosa#84
70.4%73.047
35
XW
Xin Yu Wang
70.1%72.176
36
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
70.0%71.370
37
Shuai Zhang
CHNShuai Zhang
70.0%70.582
38
BA
CANBianca Andreescu
69.9%69.747
39
Danielle Collins
USADanielle Collins
69.8%68.933
40
Liudmila Samsonova
RUSLiudmila Samsonova#55
69.8%68.072
41
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
69.7%67.287
42
PM
CROPetra Martic
69.7%66.439
43
BP
USABernarda Pera
69.4%65.665
44
Wang Xinyu
CHNWang Xinyu#41
69.4%64.860
45
Kimberly Birrell
AUSKimberly Birrell#69
69.1%63.9118
46
Caroline Dolehide
USACaroline Dolehide
69.0%63.164
47
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
ITAElisabetta Cocciaretto#59
68.9%62.393
48
Katerina Siniakova
CZEKaterina Siniakova#37
68.9%61.584
49
Magda Linette
POLMagda Linette#68
68.8%60.767
50
McCartney Kessler
USAMcCartney Kessler#48
68.8%59.8106

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best servers →Ace rate →1st serve points won →2nd serve points won →Fewest double faults →