TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Fewest double faults

Fewest double faults

Double faults per 100 serve points. Lower is better, so this list runs the other way round.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
SE
Leader

ITASara Errani

1.6 double faults per 100 serve points

Average
5.1
Std. dev.
1.8
Leader sits at
1.9σ
Range
1.6 … 11.2
123 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
SE
ITASara Errani
1.6100.037
2
Katie Volynets
USAKatie Volynets#91
1.799.2127
3
Yue Yuan
CHNYue Yuan
1.898.480
4
Sonay Kartal
GBRSonay Kartal#124
1.997.566
5
Jasmine Paolini
ITAJasmine Paolini#15
2.396.780
6
Renata Zarazua
MEXRenata Zarazua#73
2.495.9125
7
Yulia Putintseva
KAZYulia Putintseva#82
2.695.178
8
Magdalena Frech
POLMagdalena Frech#45
2.694.376
9
Karolina Muchova
CZEKarolina Muchova#6
2.693.466
10
Ann Li
USAAnn Li#31
2.892.6105
11
Jessica Pegula
USAJessica Pegula#3
3.091.8105
12
Lin Zhu
CHNLin Zhu
3.091.055
13
Sorana Cirstea
ROMSorana Cirstea#18
3.090.282
14
Anna Bondar
HUNAnna Bondar#78
3.089.3120
15
ZB
CHNZhuoxuan Bai
3.088.532
16
Aryna Sabalenka
BLRAryna Sabalenka#1
3.187.7104
17
Magda Linette
POLMagda Linette#68
3.286.967
18
Yuliia Starodubtseva
UKRYuliia Starodubtseva#65
3.286.1123
19
Iva Jovic
USAIva Jovic#16
3.285.287
20
Taylor Townsend
USATaylor Townsend#110
3.384.464
21
Tatjana Maria
GERTatjana Maria#80
3.383.696
22
Viktorija Golubic
SUIViktorija Golubic#51
3.582.8101
23
Shuai Zhang
CHNShuai Zhang
3.582.082
24
Lucia Bronzetti
ITALucia Bronzetti#115
3.681.188
25
AK
SRBAleksandra Krunic
3.680.341
26
SV
Sachia Vickery
3.779.536
27
Elena Rybakina
KAZElena Rybakina#2
3.878.7111
28
Veronika Kudermetova
RUSVeronika Kudermetova#129
3.877.963
29
Anhelina Kalinina
UKRAnhelina Kalinina#54
3.877.068
30
Sara Bejlek
CZESara Bejlek#38
3.976.286
31
Rebecca Sramkova
SVKRebecca Sramkova#143
3.975.495
32
Nao Hibino
JPNNao Hibino
4.074.6106
33
McCartney Kessler
USAMcCartney Kessler#48
4.073.8106
34
Laura Siegemund
GERLaura Siegemund#88
4.073.070
35
XW
Xiyu Wang
4.072.169
36
Sara Sorribes Tormo
ESPSara Sorribes Tormo
4.171.352
37
Alexandra Eala
PHIAlexandra Eala#20
4.170.5120
38
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
ITAElisabetta Cocciaretto#59
4.169.793
39
Erika Andreeva
RUSErika Andreeva
4.268.989
40
Dalma Galfi
HUNDalma Galfi
4.268.0112
41
Belinda Bencic
SUIBelinda Bencic#14
4.367.275
42
Cristina Bucsa
ESPCristina Bucsa#40
4.366.498
43
Naomi Osaka
JPNNaomi Osaka#13
4.365.662
44
Claire Liu
USAClaire Liu#116
4.464.876
45
Elina Svitolina
UKRElina Svitolina#9
4.563.982
46
Diana Shnaider
RUSDiana Shnaider#17
4.563.191
47
Zeynep Sonmez
TURZeynep Sonmez#52
4.562.3115
48
YW
CHNYafan Wang
4.561.532
49
Diane Parry
FRADiane Parry#64
4.660.770
50
BA
CANBianca Andreescu
4.659.847

How this is calculated

  • Lower is better. This ranking runs the other way round: number one is the smallest figure, and the green half of the bar is the half below the tour average.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best servers →Hold percentage →Ace rate →1st serve points won →2nd serve points won →