TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Best returners

Best returners

Return points won per 100 above what the rest of the tour manages against the same servers. Facing weak serves does not flatter anyone here.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jannik Sinner
Leader

ITAJannik Sinner

+7.3 points per 100 return points above the tour

Average
0.9
Std. dev.
2.1
Leader sits at
3.0σ
Range
-6.9 … 7.3
121 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
+7.3100.098
2
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
+6.899.2102
3
Mariano Navone
ARGMariano Navone#44
+6.198.3114
4
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
+5.197.5103
5
Francisco Cerundolo
ARGFrancisco Cerundolo#23
+4.896.789
6
Daniil Medvedev
RUSDaniil Medvedev#6
+4.595.895
7
Lorenzo Musetti
ITALorenzo Musetti#13
+3.995.088
8
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
+3.694.258
9
Damir Dzumhur
BIHDamir Dzumhur#104
+3.593.3152
10
Corentin Moutet
FRACorentin Moutet#59
+3.392.5109
11
Vit Kopriva
CZEVit Kopriva#71
+3.291.7156
12
Sebastian Baez
ARGSebastian Baez#48
+3.290.875
13
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
ESPAlejandro Davidovich Fokina#25
+3.190.088
14
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#19
+3.189.2137
15
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NEDBotic Van De Zandschulp#70
+2.988.398
16
Jacob Fearnley
GBRJacob Fearnley#110
+2.887.5110
17
Tommy Paul
USATommy Paul#21
+2.886.773
18
Marton Fucsovics
HUNMarton Fucsovics#83
+2.885.885
19
DG
BELDavid Goffin
+2.785.088
20
Cristian Garin
CHICristian Garin#136
+2.784.2112
21
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESPRoberto Carballes Baena
+2.783.375
22
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
+2.682.579
23
Jack Draper
GBRJack Draper#143
+2.681.743
24
Jaume Munar
ESPJaume Munar#45
+2.580.893
25
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
+2.480.0113
26
KN
JPNKei Nishikori
+2.379.243
27
Arthur Fils
FRAArthur Fils#24
+2.378.360
28
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#116
+2.377.567
29
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARGCamilo Ugo Carabelli#76
+2.276.7161
30
Jesper de Jong
NEDJesper de Jong#105
+2.275.8146
31
Pedro Martinez
ESPPedro Martinez#148
+2.275.094
32
FF
ITAFabio Fognini
+2.174.254
33
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#22
+2.073.3113
34
Jenson Brooksby
USAJenson Brooksby#74
+2.072.564
35
Denis Shapovalov
CANDenis Shapovalov#43
+1.871.772
36
Dusan Lajovic
SERDusan Lajovic#149
+1.870.894
37
Andrey Rublev
RUSAndrey Rublev#16
+1.770.085
38
Hugo Gaston
FRAHugo Gaston#96
+1.769.2110
39
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
+1.768.349
40
Zizou Bergs
BELZizou Bergs#34
+1.767.5117
41
Pablo Carreno Busta
ESPPablo Carreno Busta#68
+1.766.794
42
Joao Fonseca
BRAJoao Fonseca#27
+1.765.8111
43
SK
USASebastian Korda#50
+1.665.063
44
BC
CROBorna Coric
+1.564.256
45
Zachary Svajda
USAZachary Svajda#87
+1.563.3138
46
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#58
+1.462.561
47
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
+1.461.797
48
Flavio Cobolli
ITAFlavio Cobolli#9
+1.460.899
49
YN
JPNYoshihito Nishioka
+1.460.057
50
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
+1.259.2101

How this is calculated

  • Opponent-adjusted. It is the excess over what the rest of the tour manages AGAINST THE SAME OPPONENTS, shrunk towards zero by n/(n+15). Without that adjustment the list rewards whoever never meets a good opponent: a Challenger regular topped the raw table.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Break percentage →Break points converted →