TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialAnalysisModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Best returners

Best returners

Return points won per 100 above what the rest of the tour manages against the same servers. Facing weak serves does not flatter anyone here.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jannik Sinner
Leader

ITAJannik Sinner

+7.3 points per 100 return points above the tour

Average
0.9
Std. dev.
2.0
Leader sits at
3.2σ
Range
-6.9 … 7.3
122 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
+7.3100.098
2
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
+6.899.2102
3
Mariano Navone
ARGMariano Navone#44
+6.198.3114
4
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#8
+5.197.5103
5
Francisco Cerundolo
ARGFrancisco Cerundolo#25
+4.896.789
6
Daniil Medvedev
RUSDaniil Medvedev#7
+4.595.995
7
Lorenzo Musetti
ITALorenzo Musetti#15
+3.995.088
8
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
+3.694.258
9
Damir Dzumhur
BIHDamir Dzumhur#104
+3.593.4152
10
Corentin Moutet
FRACorentin Moutet#60
+3.392.6109
11
Vit Kopriva
CZEVit Kopriva#71
+3.291.7156
12
Sebastian Baez
ARGSebastian Baez#53
+3.290.975
13
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
ESPAlejandro Davidovich Fokina#27
+3.190.188
14
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#12
+3.189.3137
15
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NEDBotic Van De Zandschulp#59
+2.988.498
16
Jacob Fearnley
GBRJacob Fearnley#107
+2.887.6110
17
Tommy Paul
USATommy Paul#24
+2.886.873
18
Marton Fucsovics
HUNMarton Fucsovics#82
+2.886.085
19
DG
BELDavid Goffin
+2.785.188
20
Cristian Garin
CHICristian Garin#137
+2.784.3112
21
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESPRoberto Carballes Baena
+2.783.575
22
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#17
+2.682.679
23
Jack Draper
GBRJack Draper#143
+2.681.843
24
Jaume Munar
ESPJaume Munar#46
+2.581.093
25
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
+2.480.2113
26
KN
JPNKei Nishikori
+2.379.343
27
Arthur Fils
FRAArthur Fils#21
+2.378.560
28
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#118
+2.377.767
29
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARGCamilo Ugo Carabelli#76
+2.276.9161
30
Jesper de Jong
NEDJesper de Jong#106
+2.276.0146
31
Pedro Martinez
ESPPedro Martinez
+2.275.294
32
FF
ITAFabio Fognini
+2.174.454
33
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#20
+2.073.6113
34
Jenson Brooksby
USAJenson Brooksby#74
+2.072.764
35
Denis Shapovalov
CANDenis Shapovalov#48
+1.871.972
36
Dusan Lajovic
SERDusan Lajovic#146
+1.871.194
37
Andrey Rublev
RUSAndrey Rublev#18
+1.770.285
38
Hugo Gaston
FRAHugo Gaston#97
+1.769.4110
39
HR
DENHolger Rune#102
+1.768.649
40
Zizou Bergs
BELZizou Bergs#33
+1.767.8117
41
Pablo Carreno Busta
ESPPablo Carreno Busta#72
+1.766.994
42
Joao Fonseca
BRAJoao Fonseca#26
+1.766.1111
43
SK
USASebastian Korda#64
+1.665.363
44
BC
CROBorna Coric
+1.564.556
45
Zachary Svajda
USAZachary Svajda#84
+1.563.6138
46
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#62
+1.462.861
47
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
+1.462.097
48
Flavio Cobolli
ITAFlavio Cobolli#10
+1.461.299
49
YN
JPNYoshihito Nishioka
+1.460.357
50
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#16
+1.259.5101

How this is calculated

  • Opponent-adjusted. It is the excess over what the rest of the tour manages AGAINST THE SAME OPPONENTS, shrunk towards zero by n/(n+15). Without that adjustment the list rewards whoever never meets a good opponent: a Challenger regular topped the raw table.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Break percentage →Break points converted →