TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Closing out

Closing out

Matches won after taking the first set. The inverse of the comeback, and the number in-play money moves on.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jacob Fearnley
Leader

GBRJacob Fearnley

97.2% of matches closed out after winning the first set

Average
82.4%
Std. dev.
5.5
Leader sits at
2.7σ
Range
69.1 … 97.2
131 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jacob Fearnley
GBRJacob Fearnley#110
97.2%100.071
2
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#116
94.7%99.257
3
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
94.4%98.5178
4
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
94.1%97.7256
5
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
93.6%96.9282
6
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARGCamilo Ugo Carabelli#76
92.2%96.290
7
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#19
92.2%95.4115
8
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
91.4%94.6209
9
Daniil Medvedev
RUSDaniil Medvedev#6
91.3%93.8231
10
MM
GERMaximilian Marterer
91.2%93.134
11
Stefanos Tsitsipas
GREStefanos Tsitsipas#53
90.6%92.3192
12
Grigor Dimitrov
BULGrigor Dimitrov#137
90.5%91.5137
13
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
90.4%90.8251
14
NK
AUSNick Kyrgios
90.0%90.030
15
RN
ESPRafael Nadal
89.6%89.248
16
Joao Fonseca
BRAJoao Fonseca#27
89.4%88.585
17
Yannick Hanfmann
GERYannick Hanfmann#57
89.4%87.7113
18
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#22
89.2%86.9102
19
SK
USASebastian Korda#50
89.0%86.2127
20
Jack Draper
GBRJack Draper#143
88.6%85.4105
21
Jenson Brooksby
USAJenson Brooksby#74
88.4%84.669
22
Francisco Comesana
ARGFrancisco Comesana#107
88.2%83.876
23
Flavio Cobolli
ITAFlavio Cobolli#9
88.1%83.1101
24
Arthur Fils
FRAArthur Fils#24
87.9%82.399
25
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#58
87.8%81.582
26
Lorenzo Musetti
ITALorenzo Musetti#13
87.7%80.8155
27
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
87.7%80.0219
28
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
87.6%79.2145
29
Taylor Fritz
USATaylor Fritz#8
87.2%78.5235
30
Andrey Rublev
RUSAndrey Rublev#16
86.5%77.7208
31
Alexander Bublik
KAZAlexander Bublik#11
86.5%76.9141
32
Matteo Berrettini
ITAMatteo Berrettini#40
86.2%76.2116
33
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
85.7%75.4119
34
Tommy Paul
USATommy Paul#21
85.6%74.6194
35
Cameron Norrie
GBRCameron Norrie#37
85.5%73.8173
36
ER
FINEmil Ruusuvuori
85.4%73.196
37
Ethan Quinn
USAEthan Quinn#51
85.4%72.389
38
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
85.3%71.568
39
Gabriel Diallo
CANGabriel Diallo#108
85.2%70.888
40
Aleksandar Vukic
AUSAleksandar Vukic#101
85.1%70.094
41
Valentin Vacherot
MONValentin Vacherot#18
84.9%69.286
42
Denis Shapovalov
CANDenis Shapovalov#43
84.8%68.5125
43
Jiri Lehecka
CZEJiri Lehecka#12
84.6%67.7136
44
YN
JPNYoshihito Nishioka
84.4%66.990
45
Damir Dzumhur
BIHDamir Dzumhur#104
84.4%66.296
46
DS
ARGDiego Schwartzman
84.1%65.463
47
Brandon Nakashima
USABrandon Nakashima#31
84.1%64.6176
48
Roberto Bautista Agut
ESPRoberto Bautista Agut
84.1%63.8113
49
Adrian Mannarino
FRAAdrian Mannarino#47
83.9%63.1124
50
Jesper de Jong
NEDJesper de Jong#105
83.7%62.392

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 20 matches after winning the first set. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Five years of results. These rows need only the scoreline, which exists far further back than serve statistics do.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Break points saved →Tiebreak record →Deciding sets →Comebacks →