TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Break points converted

Break points converted

Break points taken out of break points earned. Creating them and taking them are different abilities.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
KN
Leader

JPNKei Nishikori

46.6% of break points converted

Average
39.3%
Std. dev.
3.3
Leader sits at
2.2σ
Range
30.0 … 46.6
121 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
KN
JPNKei Nishikori
46.6%100.043
2
Sebastian Baez
ARGSebastian Baez#48
44.8%99.275
3
Zachary Svajda
USAZachary Svajda#87
44.7%98.3138
4
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#19
44.5%97.5137
5
Damir Dzumhur
BIHDamir Dzumhur#104
44.5%96.7152
6
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#58
44.4%95.861
7
Vit Kopriva
CZEVit Kopriva#71
44.2%95.0156
8
Mariano Navone
ARGMariano Navone#44
44.2%94.2114
9
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
44.0%93.3102
10
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
ESPAlejandro Davidovich Fokina#25
43.9%92.588
11
MM
GERMaximilian Marterer
43.9%91.738
12
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARGCamilo Ugo Carabelli#76
43.9%90.8161
13
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
43.9%90.098
14
Jacob Fearnley
GBRJacob Fearnley#110
43.5%89.2110
15
Francisco Cerundolo
ARGFrancisco Cerundolo#23
43.3%88.389
16
Denis Shapovalov
CANDenis Shapovalov#43
43.0%87.572
17
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#116
43.0%86.767
18
Juncheng Shang
CHNJuncheng Shang
43.0%85.841
19
Mackenzie McDonald
USAMackenzie McDonald#144
43.0%85.0118
20
Tommy Paul
USATommy Paul#21
42.9%84.273
21
GZ
ITAGiulio Zeppieri
42.9%83.399
22
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
42.7%82.5103
23
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
42.6%81.749
24
FF
ITAFabio Fognini
42.6%80.854
25
YN
JPNYoshihito Nishioka
42.3%80.057
26
RG
FRARichard Gasquet
42.1%79.260
27
Jaume Munar
ESPJaume Munar#45
41.9%78.393
28
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
41.8%77.558
29
Cristian Garin
CHICristian Garin#136
41.8%76.7112
30
Hugo Gaston
FRAHugo Gaston#96
41.6%75.8110
31
Rinky Hijikata
AUSRinky Hijikata#93
41.5%75.0126
32
Benjamin Bonzi
FRABenjamin Bonzi#103
41.3%74.2142
33
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
41.2%73.3101
34
Valentin Vacherot
MONValentin Vacherot#18
41.1%72.5127
35
CO
AUSChristopher Oconnell
41.1%71.780
36
DE
GBRDaniel Evans
41.0%70.860
37
Corentin Moutet
FRACorentin Moutet#59
40.9%70.0109
38
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
40.8%69.2113
39
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NEDBotic Van De Zandschulp#70
40.7%68.398
40
Jesper de Jong
NEDJesper de Jong#105
40.7%67.5146
41
Alejandro Tabilo
CHIAlejandro Tabilo#26
40.7%66.791
42
LD
SRBLaslo Djere
40.5%65.875
43
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
40.5%65.079
44
Alexander Bublik
KAZAlexander Bublik#11
40.4%64.298
45
AV
ITAAndrea Vavassori
40.4%63.347
46
Frances Tiafoe
USAFrances Tiafoe#20
40.2%62.575
47
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#22
40.1%61.7113
48
Francisco Comesana
ARGFrancisco Comesana#107
40.0%60.8132
49
Luca Nardi
ITALuca Nardi
40.0%60.0117
50
Pablo Carreno Busta
ESPPablo Carreno Busta#68
40.0%59.294

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best returners →Break percentage →