ATP

Arthur Nagel

Ranking—

Compare Players

Player details

Plays: Right-handed

Recent form

Last 4 recorded matches · up to 20 · newest first

1 Wins 3 Losses

Threats

Untested surface
Barely any matches on grass: any forecast there leans on his overall level, not on direct evidence.
fewer than 5 matches

Basis and methodology

Computed from 1 tiebreaks, 1 deciding sets, Elo by surface.

Surface overview

Surface data window

All recorded results, not necessarily a complete career. This selector changes only the surface overview.

Clay
33.3%
1 Wins · 2 Losses · 3 recorded matches
Hard
0%
0 Wins · 1 Losses · 1 recorded matches

Track = recorded win percentage, on a 0–100% scale.

Elo ratings

Current ratings from recorded history. Overall and surface ratings use different scales; do not rank them against each other.

Overall: 1,482; 114 recorded matches
Hard: 1,487; 62 recorded matches
Clay: 1,456; 52 recorded matches
Grass: —; 0 recorded matches

Serve & return

Last 12 months · 2 recorded matches

Raw player aggregates, not circuit averages or performance ratings. Samples vary by metric; the match count is not the denominator for every percentage. Tracks run from 0 to 100%.

Aces per sampled match: 3
Double faults per sampled match: 3
All points won: 48%

Serve

2 recorded matches

First serves in: 71%
First-serve points won: 62%
Second-serve points won: 43%
Break points saved: —
Service points won: 56%

Return

2 recorded matches

First-serve return points won: 28%
Second-serve return points won: 59%
Break points converted: —
Return points won: 40%

Return values are derived from opponents’ serve data.

Pending validation: hold/break rates, shot averages and ratios, and clutch/deciding-set metrics are omitted.

Match length

How this player’s matches have finished, best of three, last five years.

21.7Average gamesReference mean: 21.4

20MedianReference median: 20

112Matches counted

Explore all games lines

Reference: 159,624 completed best-of-three matches in our database, ATP + WTA combined, all levels and surfaces, last five years. Retirements and walkovers excluded; not a circuit average.

Share of matches above each games line; difference = player minus reference, in percentage points. Observed results, not a forecast.
Line	Over	Reference	Difference
16.5	80.4%	77.4%	+3
18.5	65.2%	59.6%

Arthur Nagel

Recent form

SWOT analysis

Threats

Surface overview

Clay

Hard

Elo ratings

Serve & return

Serve

Return

Match length

Match activity

Challenger Rennes (Hard)

ITF M25 Carnac

ITF M25 Deauville

Challenger Aix En Provence