TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Tiebreak record

Tiebreak record

Tiebreaks won. Twelve tiebreaks is twelve coin flips, so this list needs twenty of them before it will name you.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jannik Sinner
Leader

ITAJannik Sinner

69.4% of tiebreaks won

Average
51.9%
Std. dev.
6.4
Leader sits at
2.7σ
Range
33.3 … 69.4
133 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
69.4%100.0134
2
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
67.8%99.2118
3
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#19
65.6%98.590
4
AV
ITAAndrea Vavassori
64.7%97.734
5
Jenson Brooksby
USAJenson Brooksby#74
64.1%97.039
6
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
63.1%96.2149
7
JT
AUSJordan Thompson
63.0%95.573
8
GM
FRAGael Monfils
62.1%94.766
9
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
61.4%93.970
10
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
61.1%93.2198
11
Arthur Fils
FRAArthur Fils#24
60.9%92.487
12
Rinky Hijikata
AUSRinky Hijikata#93
60.7%91.784
13
Matteo Berrettini
ITAMatteo Berrettini#40
60.2%90.9128
14
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
59.9%90.2137
15
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
59.8%89.4122
16
YN
JPNYoshihito Nishioka
59.7%88.667
17
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
59.4%87.9106
18
Taylor Fritz
USATaylor Fritz#8
59.3%87.1209
19
RN
ESPRafael Nadal
59.1%86.422
20
Frances Tiafoe
USAFrances Tiafoe#20
58.6%85.6191
21
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
58.3%84.8115
22
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRAGiovanni Mpetshi Perricard#91
58.2%84.1134
23
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#58
57.8%83.364
24
Grigor Dimitrov
BULGrigor Dimitrov#137
57.8%82.6116
25
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#22
57.7%81.878
26
Matteo Arnaldi
ITAMatteo Arnaldi#35
57.1%81.1105
27
DT
AUTDominic Thiem
57.1%80.349
28
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#116
56.8%79.544
29
BC
CROBorna Coric
56.6%78.876
30
Ethan Quinn
USAEthan Quinn#51
56.3%78.087
31
Terence Atmane
FRATerence Atmane#46
56.1%77.382
32
TR
Tim Van Rijthoven
56.0%76.525
33
Reilly Opelka
USAReilly Opelka#142
55.7%75.8122
34
Hugo Gaston
FRAHugo Gaston#96
55.7%75.070
35
Joao Fonseca
BRAJoao Fonseca#27
55.4%74.274
36
Pablo Carreno Busta
ESPPablo Carreno Busta#68
55.3%73.585
37
Jiri Lehecka
CZEJiri Lehecka#12
55.0%72.7109
38
Alex Michelsen
USAAlex Michelsen#42
54.9%72.0102
39
Daniil Medvedev
RUSDaniil Medvedev#6
54.9%71.2144
40
Mattia Bellucci
ITAMattia Bellucci#80
54.4%70.579
41
Hamad Medjedovic
SERHamad Medjedovic#73
54.3%69.781
42
Benjamin Bonzi
FRABenjamin Bonzi#103
54.2%68.9118
43
Tallon Griekspoor
NEDTallon Griekspoor#69
54.2%68.2166
44
Roberto Bautista Agut
ESPRoberto Bautista Agut
54.1%67.4109
45
Stefanos Tsitsipas
GREStefanos Tsitsipas#53
53.9%66.7178
46
AS
KAZAlexander Shevchenko
53.8%65.991
47
TK
AUSThanasi Kokkinakis
53.8%65.291
48
Hubert Hurkacz
POLHubert Hurkacz#72
53.7%64.4216
49
Juncheng Shang
CHNJuncheng Shang
53.7%63.654
50
Quentin Halys
FRAQuentin Halys#54
53.6%62.9140

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 20 tiebreaks played. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Five years of results. These rows need only the scoreline, which exists far further back than serve statistics do.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Break points saved →Deciding sets →Comebacks →Closing out →