TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Set margin

Set margin

Average games won minus games lost, per set. Distinguishes a 6-1 6-2 career from a 7-6 7-6 one.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jannik Sinner
Leader

ITAJannik Sinner

1.82 games per set

Average
0.21
Std. dev.
0.42
Leader sits at
3.8σ
Range
-0.54 … 1.82
132 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
1.82100.0348
2
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
1.6599.2245
3
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
1.6298.5330
4
Daniil Medvedev
RUSDaniil Medvedev#6
1.1797.7341
5
RN
ESPRafael Nadal
1.1296.970
6
Alexander Zverev
GERAlexander Zverev#3
1.0796.2371
7
Jack Draper
GBRJack Draper#143
0.9295.4167
8
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
0.8894.7349
9
Taylor Fritz
USATaylor Fritz#8
0.8793.9353
10
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
0.8493.1329
11
Stefanos Tsitsipas
GREStefanos Tsitsipas#53
0.7792.4314
12
NK
AUSNick Kyrgios
0.7691.657
13
Learner Tien
USALearner Tien#19
0.7690.8189
14
Tommy Paul
USATommy Paul#21
0.7390.1306
15
Andrey Rublev
RUSAndrey Rublev#16
0.7389.3340
16
Valentin Vacherot
MONValentin Vacherot#18
0.7288.5151
17
Grigor Dimitrov
BULGrigor Dimitrov#137
0.7187.8230
18
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
0.6787.0114
19
Hubert Hurkacz
POLHubert Hurkacz#72
0.6386.3270
20
Joao Fonseca
BRAJoao Fonseca#27
0.6085.5150
21
Matteo Berrettini
ITAMatteo Berrettini#40
0.6084.7192
22
SK
USASebastian Korda#50
0.5684.0219
23
Jacob Fearnley
GBRJacob Fearnley#110
0.5483.2142
24
GZ
ITAGiulio Zeppieri
0.4982.4117
25
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
0.4981.7250
26
Pablo Carreno Busta
ESPPablo Carreno Busta#68
0.4980.9206
27
Arthur Cazaux
FRAArthur Cazaux#138
0.4780.2116
28
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
0.4679.4174
29
Jesper de Jong
NEDJesper de Jong#105
0.4678.6177
30
Cameron Norrie
GBRCameron Norrie#37
0.4577.9308
31
Karen Khachanov
RUSKaren Khachanov#39
0.4577.1275
32
Arthur Fils
FRAArthur Fils#24
0.4576.3171
33
Mariano Navone
ARGMariano Navone#44
0.4475.6177
34
Francisco Cerundolo
ARGFrancisco Cerundolo#23
0.4474.8278
35
Brandon Nakashima
USABrandon Nakashima#31
0.4274.0301
36
GM
FRAGael Monfils
0.4073.3150
37
Ben Shelton
USABen Shelton#10
0.3772.5231
38
Marin Cilic
CROMarin Cilic#85
0.3771.8170
39
Lorenzo Musetti
ITALorenzo Musetti#13
0.3671.0296
40
Wu Yibing
CHNWu Yibing#116
0.3470.2112
41
Hamad Medjedovic
SERHamad Medjedovic#73
0.3469.5152
42
Tomas Machac
CZETomas Machac#58
0.3468.7145
43
Denis Shapovalov
CANDenis Shapovalov#43
0.3367.9233
44
Frances Tiafoe
USAFrances Tiafoe#20
0.3367.2294
45
Alejandro Tabilo
CHIAlejandro Tabilo#26
0.3366.4214
46
Bu Yunchaokete
CHNBu Yunchaokete#118
0.3265.6156
47
Gabriel Diallo
CANGabriel Diallo#108
0.3264.9173
48
Zachary Svajda
USAZachary Svajda#87
0.3264.1181
49
Ugo Humbert
FRAUgo Humbert#28
0.3263.4236
50
Luciano Darderi
ITALuciano Darderi#22
0.3162.6188

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with a recorded score. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Five years of results. These rows need only the scoreline, which exists far further back than serve statistics do.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Win percentage →Straight-set wins →Bagels handed out →