TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Best servers

Best servers

Serve points won per 100 above what the rest of the tour manages against the same opponents. A ranking of aces measures the schedule; this measures the server.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Martin Damm
Leader

USAMartin Damm

+6.6 points per 100 serve points above the tour

Average
0.2
Std. dev.
2.1
Leader sits at
3.0σ
Range
-6.5 … 6.6
963 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Martin Damm
USAMartin Damm#100
+6.6100.0119
2
JM
GBRJohannus Monday
+6.199.975
3
Alec Deckers
Alec Deckers
+5.599.853
4
DS
INDDhakshineswar Suresh
+5.299.742
5
Thiago Monteiro
BRAThiago Monteiro
+5.099.6115
6
GL
GBRGeorge Loffhagen
+4.999.567
7
Soon Woo Kwon
KORSoon Woo Kwon
+4.899.448
8
Borna Gojo
CROBorna Gojo
+4.899.376
9
Marc Andrea Huesler
SUIMarc Andrea Huesler
+4.799.2126
10
Keegan Smith
USAKeegan Smith
+4.799.1137
11
Leandro Riedi
SUILeandro Riedi#128
+4.599.082
12
MR
GERMats Rosenkranz
+4.598.991
13
HS
GBRHamish Stewart
+4.598.8119
14
LC
SUILuca Castelnuovo
+4.598.679
15
JK
AUSJason Kubler
+4.498.556
16
August Holmgren
DENAugust Holmgren
+4.398.4108
17
Patrick Kypson
USAPatrick Kypson#112
+4.398.3131
18
JK
SUIJerome Kym
+4.398.2100
19
LH
RSALloyd Harris
+4.398.190
20
JT
JPNJames Trotter
+4.298.0131
21
DM
ROUDragos Nicolae Madaras
+4.297.931
22
Henry Searle
GBRHenry Searle
+4.197.8111
23
Gustavo Heide
BRAGustavo Heide#131
+4.197.7112
24
JL
Joris De Loore
+4.197.661
25
LM
FRALilian Marmousez
+4.097.578
26
NV
NEDNiels Visker
+3.997.485
27
MK
SVKMilos Karol
+3.997.396
28
BZ
KAZBeibit Zhukayev
+3.997.2133
29
BD
SRBBranko Djuric
+3.997.174
30
OM
SRBOgnjen Milic
+3.997.069
31
Carlo Alberto Caniato
ITACarlo Alberto Caniato
+3.996.967
32
Tuncay Duran
Tuncay Duran
+3.896.851
33
MS
RUSMarat Sharipov
+3.896.799
34
TT
Thiago Tirante
+3.896.6160
35
JW
NZLJames Watt
+3.896.542
36
Stefanos Sakellaridis
GREStefanos Sakellaridis
+3.896.4116
37
MC
Maxime Cressy
+3.896.359
38
MA
BRAMateus Alves
+3.796.2110
39
LP
FRALucas Pouille
+3.796.059
40
Petr Bar Biryukov
RUSPetr Bar Biryukov
+3.795.9105
41
AG
GBRAlastair Gray
+3.795.890
42
IM
BRAIgor Ribeiro Marcondes
+3.795.772
43
FB
GERFlorian Broska
+3.795.683
44
DS
SUIDominic Stricker
+3.795.570
45
TC
BELTibo Colson
+3.795.493
46
Florent Bax
FRAFlorent Bax
+3.795.3129
47
Anton Shepp
Anton Shepp
+3.795.249
48
Toby Samuel
GBRToby Samuel#109
+3.795.185
49
NA
USANicolas Moreno De Alboran
+3.695.094
50
FP
ITAFrancesco Passaro
+3.694.9133

How this is calculated

  • Opponent-adjusted. It is the excess over what the rest of the tour manages AGAINST THE SAME OPPONENTS, shrunk towards zero by n/(n+15). Without that adjustment the list rewards whoever never meets a good opponent: a Challenger regular topped the raw table.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Hold percentage →Ace rate →1st serve points won →2nd serve points won →Fewest double faults →