TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Best returners

Best returners

Return points won per 100 above what the rest of the tour manages against the same servers. Facing weak serves does not flatter anyone here.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
AG
Leader

RUSAnastasia Gasanova

+5.4 points per 100 return points above the tour

Average
0.4
Std. dev.
1.8
Leader sits at
2.8σ
Range
-4.5 … 5.4
678 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
AG
RUSAnastasia Gasanova
+5.4100.076
2
Alexandra Shubladze
RUSAlexandra Shubladze
+5.499.970
3
AO
Alisa Oktiabreva
+5.299.750
4
EB
GEREva Bennemann
+4.899.648
5
Daria Snigur
UKRDaria Snigur#43
+4.699.4106
6
LA
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
+4.599.332
7
LT
Lavinia Tanasie
+4.599.137
8
AT
Amarissa Kiara Toth
+4.499.067
9
Tereza Valentova
CZETereza Valentova#67
+4.498.876
10
Oleksandra Oliynykova
UKROleksandra Oliynykova#44
+4.398.797
11
Lisa Pigato
ITALisa Pigato#133
+4.298.592
12
LC
Lourdes Carle
+4.198.4114
13
ET
CZEEliska Tichackova
+4.198.235
14
EP
RUSEkaterina Perelygina
+4.198.153
15
Darya Astakhova
RUSDarya Astakhova
+4.197.962
16
Madison Brengle
USAMadison Brengle
+4.097.841
17
DE
Daria Egorova
+4.097.649
18
Vendula Valdmannova
CZEVendula Valdmannova
+3.997.560
19
AO
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
+3.997.348
20
NS
Neus Torner Sensano
+3.897.231
21
Maja Chwalinska
POLMaja Chwalinska#22
+3.897.089
22
Elizara Yaneva
BULElizara Yaneva
+3.696.964
23
Alina Korneeva
RUSAlina Korneeva#89
+3.696.880
24
Lucrezia Stefanini
ITALucrezia Stefanini#147
+3.596.6107
25
MG
Maria Aran Teixido Garcia
+3.596.564
26
AS
MEXAna Sofia Sanchez
+3.496.385
27
NS
Natalija Senic
+3.496.256
28
AM
ITAAlessandra Mazzola
+3.496.051
29
Jeline Vandromme
BELJeline Vandromme#132
+3.495.975
30
DK
Daria Khomutsianskaya
+3.495.764
31
AS
CZEAnna Siskova
+3.495.681
32
HS
Hibah Shaikh
+3.495.469
33
Yelyzaveta Kotliar
UKRYelyzaveta Kotliar
+3.495.366
34
Fangran Tian
CHNFangran Tian
+3.495.166
35
SL
RUSSofya Lansere
+3.495.074
36
AL
Alize Lim
+3.394.831
37
AG
ESPAriana Geerlings
+3.394.749
38
DG
Denislava Glushkova
+3.394.563
39
Julie Struplova
CZEJulie Struplova
+3.394.460
40
KS
GBRKatie Swan
+3.394.256
41
MG
GERMara Guth
+3.394.156
42
Sinja Kraus
AUTSinja Kraus#81
+3.393.9126
43
KZ
Ksenia Zaytseva
+3.293.835
44
JS
Joelle Lilly Sophie Steur
+3.293.666
45
Yeon Woo Ku
KORYeon Woo Ku
+3.293.584
46
JF
CROJana Fett
+3.293.456
47
Laura Samson
CZELaura Samson#123
+3.293.266
48
CH
SWECaijsa Wilda Hennemann
+3.293.152
49
Luisina Giovannini
ARGLuisina Giovannini
+3.292.975
50
PC
Patcharin Cheapchandej
+3.292.852

How this is calculated

  • Opponent-adjusted. It is the excess over what the rest of the tour manages AGAINST THE SAME OPPONENTS, shrunk towards zero by n/(n+15). Without that adjustment the list rewards whoever never meets a good opponent: a Challenger regular topped the raw table.
  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Break percentage →Break points converted →