TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Break points converted

Break points converted

Break points taken out of break points earned. Creating them and taking them are different abilities.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
SD
Leader

Sara Daavettila

57.3% of break points converted

Average
48.5%
Std. dev.
3.1
Leader sits at
2.8σ
Range
36.9 … 57.3
678 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
SD
Sara Daavettila
57.3%100.051
2
NW
SWENellie Taraba Wallberg
57.1%99.934
3
Cadence Brace
CANCadence Brace
56.4%99.757
4
LT
Lavinia Tanasie
56.1%99.637
5
HS
Hibah Shaikh
55.9%99.469
6
AK
AUTArabella Koller
55.8%99.330
7
LZ
Louna Zoppas
55.6%99.130
8
NS
Natalija Senic
55.5%99.056
9
AS
JPNAyano Shimizu
55.3%98.851
10
JG
Jimar Geraldine Gerald Gonzalez
55.3%98.731
11
DE
Daria Egorova
55.2%98.549
12
Alexandra Shubladze
RUSAlexandra Shubladze
55.2%98.470
13
DG
Denislava Glushkova
55.1%98.263
14
EI
FRAEleejah Inisan
55.0%98.141
15
Polina Iatcenko
RUSPolina Iatcenko
55.0%97.970
16
Jazmin Ortenzi
ARGJazmin Ortenzi
54.9%97.880
17
AG
RUSAnastasia Gasanova
54.8%97.676
18
Francesca Curmi
MLTFrancesca Curmi
54.3%97.564
19
VG
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
54.3%97.357
20
NS
Neus Torner Sensano
54.2%97.231
21
BZ
Beatrise Zeltina
54.2%97.045
22
GL
ROUGabriela Lee
54.2%96.948
23
PC
Patcharin Cheapchandej
54.2%96.852
24
CH
SWECaijsa Wilda Hennemann
54.1%96.652
25
DI
Dasha Ivanova
54.0%96.559
26
II
Iva Ivanova
54.0%96.365
27
MG
Maria Aran Teixido Garcia
53.9%96.264
28
JW
CHNJiayi Wang
53.9%96.056
29
Jeline Vandromme
BELJeline Vandromme#132
53.9%95.975
30
Fangran Tian
CHNFangran Tian
53.9%95.766
31
MM
Mio Mushika
53.9%95.655
32
MS
Marta Soriano Santiago
53.9%95.433
33
EB
GEREva Bennemann
53.9%95.348
34
AM
ITAAlessandra Mazzola
53.8%95.151
35
AT
Amarissa Kiara Toth
53.7%95.067
36
RA
Robin Anderson
53.6%94.831
37
AS
Aruzhan Sagandykova
53.6%94.742
38
IB
NEDIsis Louise Van Den Broek
53.6%94.550
39
VP
BELVicky Van De Peer
53.5%94.436
40
EP
RUSEkaterina Perelygina
53.5%94.253
41
RZ
Ruien Zhang
53.5%94.131
42
AC
Anchisa Chanta
53.3%93.966
43
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
ESPAndrea Lazaro Garcia
53.3%93.872
44
JD
Jenny Duerst
53.2%93.647
45
AK
BLRAnna Kubareva
53.2%93.550
46
ET
CZEEliska Tichackova
53.2%93.435
47
Yelyzaveta Kotliar
UKRYelyzaveta Kotliar
53.2%93.266
48
ML
Masha Lazarenko
53.1%93.137
49
JS
DENJohanne Christine Svendsen
53.1%92.933
50
Maja Chwalinska
POLMaja Chwalinska#22
53.0%92.889

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Best returners →Break percentage →