TennisRaptorTennisRaptor
HomeMatchesPlayersPredictionsEditorialModelRankingsStats
Compare Players
TennisRaptor

Professional tennis stats, rankings, and data.

Tennis

Live scoresPlayersRankingsTournamentsDrawsNews

Predictions

AI predictionsModel recordOddsCompare players

Statistics

All rankingsElo power rankingBest serversSurface kingsCourt speedMatch length

Site

AboutContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 TennisRaptor.com. Data sourced from ATP and WTA official sources.

TennisRaptor.com is an independent statistics platform. Not affiliated with ATP or WTA.

Forecasts are statistical models, not betting advice. 18+. Gamble responsibly.

Home›Stats›Break points saved

Break points saved

Break points survived. The serve that shows up when it is needed rather than on 40-0.

ATPWTA
TourChallenger / ITF
Jannik Sinner
Leader

ITAJannik Sinner

74.2% of break points saved

Average
62.6%
Std. dev.
3.3
Leader sits at
3.5σ
Range
54.6 … 74.2
121 players
#PlayerValuevs tour averagePctlSample
1
Jannik Sinner
ITAJannik Sinner#1
74.2%100.098
2
Reilly Opelka
USAReilly Opelka#142
72.7%99.273
3
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
FRAGiovanni Mpetshi Perricard#91
70.6%98.3108
4
Ben Shelton
USABen Shelton#10
69.3%97.587
5
Taylor Fritz
USATaylor Fritz#8
67.6%96.792
6
Marin Cilic
CROMarin Cilic#85
67.4%95.870
7
ZZ
CHNZhizhen Zhang
67.3%95.033
8
Carlos Alcaraz
ESPCarlos Alcaraz#2
67.2%94.2102
9
Valentin Vacherot
MONValentin Vacherot#18
67.1%93.3127
10
Arthur Rinderknech
FRAArthur Rinderknech#29
67.0%92.5108
11
Alexander Bublik
KAZAlexander Bublik#11
66.9%91.798
12
Stefanos Tsitsipas
GREStefanos Tsitsipas#53
66.9%90.861
13
Felix Auger-Aliassime
CANFelix Auger-Aliassime#4
66.8%90.097
14
Arthur Cazaux
FRAArthur Cazaux#138
66.7%89.291
15
Hubert Hurkacz
POLHubert Hurkacz#72
66.7%88.348
16
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
ESPAlejandro Davidovich Fokina#25
66.2%87.588
17
Tallon Griekspoor
NEDTallon Griekspoor#69
66.2%86.773
18
Alejandro Tabilo
CHIAlejandro Tabilo#26
66.2%85.891
19
Cameron Norrie
GBRCameron Norrie#37
66.1%85.095
20
NJ
CHINicolas Jarry
66.0%84.249
21
GZ
ITAGiulio Zeppieri
65.9%83.399
22
Bu Yunchaokete
CHNBu Yunchaokete#118
65.9%82.5121
23
Matteo Berrettini
ITAMatteo Berrettini#40
65.3%81.758
24
James Duckworth
AUSJames Duckworth#86
65.3%80.8149
25
Casper Ruud
NORCasper Ruud#14
65.2%80.079
26
JT
AUSJordan Thompson
65.2%79.233
27
LK
SVKLukas Klein
64.9%78.396
28
Alex de Minaur
AUSAlex de Minaur#7
64.9%77.5103
29
Novak Djokovic
SERNovak Djokovic#5
64.8%76.758
30
Ugo Humbert
FRAUgo Humbert#28
64.8%75.867
31
Juncheng Shang
CHNJuncheng Shang
64.6%75.041
32
Jakub Mensik
CZEJakub Mensik#17
64.6%74.2101
33
Karen Khachanov
RUSKaren Khachanov#39
64.5%73.378
34
Jack Draper
GBRJack Draper#143
64.5%72.543
35
Lorenzo Sonego
ITALorenzo Sonego#88
64.4%71.774
36
GM
FRAGael Monfils
64.3%70.840
37
Jiri Lehecka
CZEJiri Lehecka#12
64.1%70.079
38
HR
DENHolger Rune#99
64.1%69.249
39
Andrey Rublev
RUSAndrey Rublev#16
63.9%68.385
40
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
ARGTomas Martin Etcheverry#30
63.9%67.592
41
Corentin Moutet
FRACorentin Moutet#59
63.9%66.7109
42
Brandon Nakashima
USABrandon Nakashima#31
63.8%65.8127
43
Alexei Popyrin
AUSAlexei Popyrin#139
63.6%65.064
44
Nuno Borges
PORNuno Borges#55
63.5%64.293
45
Sebastian Ofner
AUTSebastian Ofner#126
63.4%63.369
46
AV
ITAAndrea Vavassori
63.1%62.547
47
Quentin Halys
FRAQuentin Halys#54
63.1%61.7131
48
CO
AUSChristopher Oconnell
63.1%60.880
49
Aleksandar Kovacevic
USAAleksandar Kovacevic#95
63.0%60.0125
50
Mattia Bellucci
ITAMattia Bellucci#80
63.0%59.2156

How this is calculated

  • Minimum 30 matches with serve statistics. Below that the figure is noise and publishing it would be faking precision. Each family of metrics carries its own counter — 200 matches is not 200 tiebreaks.
  • Window. Every match since 2024 — that is where serve statistics begin in this database; before that there are none.
  • One division at a time. A player belongs to the Challenger/ITF division when more than half of their matches since 2024 are played there. Mixing the two ranks schedules rather than players: the raw list of closers was headed by an ITF player at 100% over twenty matches.
  • Not a betting signal. It describes a player, not a price. Our own prediction engine is measured against the market and loses: 0.632 log loss against 0.593.

Related rankings

Tiebreak record →Deciding sets →Comebacks →Closing out →