Compare 2–4 players through results, serve/return and shot volumes — with the sample behind each figure.
The period applies to surface records, serve/return and shot volumes. Annual trends, head-to-head and the cumulative profile have their own stated windows. Missing data are not zero.
Recorded historical meetings, independent of the selected period. Not a prediction.
Win percentages grouped by surface.
| Surface | Jesper de Jong | Karen Khachanov |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 32%8 won / 25 matches | 46.7%14 won / 30 matches |
| Clay | 62.1%18 won / 29 matches | 57.9%11 won / 19 matches |
| Grass | 50%1 won / 2 matches | 50%2 won / 4 matches |
Matches without a recognised surface are not assigned to a surface.
Annual win rate across all surfaces; current year incomplete. Independent of the period selector.
Three score-derived indicators, across surfaces and levels. Each needs at least 20 relevant events. This profile does not follow the period selector.
| Metric | Jesper de Jong | Karen Khachanov |
|---|---|---|
| How they win and how they loseDerived from the score — covers every circuit, Challenger and ITF included. | ||
| Comes back after losing the 1st set | 24.7%n=89 | 29.2%n=120 |
| Closes out after winning the 1st set | 85.1%n=94 | 81.9%n=160 |
| Wins the tiebreak | 45.8%n=72 | 50.7%n=140 |
Five-year cumulative score profile, independent of the period selector. Comebacks count matches after losing set one; closeouts count matches after winning it; tiebreaks count tiebreaks. Each rate needs at least 20 events. “—” means unavailable or insufficient data, never zero.
Six observed rates, with opportunities and valid-match samples visible below.
Only valid numerator–denominator pairs from the same match contribute to each rate. Break conversion is derived from the opponent's break points faced minus those saved. The table shows the contributing counts and matches.
| Metric | Jesper de Jong | Karen Khachanov |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Serve Win % | 72.4%1,921 / 2,652 opportunitiesn=54 matches | 74.8%2,070 / 2,768 opportunitiesn=49 matches |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46.1%863 / 1,871 opportunitiesn=54 matches | 53.7%825 / 1,535 opportunitiesn=49 matches |
| 1st Return Won % | 33.9%430 / 1,270 opportunitiesn=25 matches | 30.6%351 / 1,146 opportunitiesn=20 matches |
| 2nd Return Won % | 49.6%406 / 818 opportunitiesn=25 matches | 52.9%424 / 802 opportunitiesn=20 matches |
| BP Saved % | 53.6%112 / 209 opportunitiesn=30 matches | 68.7%125 / 182 opportunitiesn=29 matches |
| BP Converted % | 38.1%77 / 202 opportunitiesn=28 matches | 40.5%70 / 173 opportunitiesn=28 matches |
Winners, aces, net points won and unforced errors per match. A description, not a skill score.
Index 100 = recorded circuit average in the selected period, pooling levels, surfaces and match formats. A larger area means more recorded shots or errors per match, not a better player.
Circuit reference: 23.5 · n=4,482
Circuit reference: 4 · n=45,264
Circuit reference: 9.2 · n=3,108
Circuit reference: 29.5 · n=4,480
Five matches is a plotting threshold, not a reliability guarantee. Each metric has its own sample. Counts per match also depend on match length.
These are observations from our match database, not an independent verification of every source record. Coverage varies by player and metric; some serve counts are reconstructed upstream from rounded percentages. Surface, opponent strength and match format are not adjusted for. Small samples and different schedules limit comparisons. Career means the history available in our database, not necessarily a complete career.
The weighted head-to-head percentage has been removed: its weights were not validated. Stored deciding-set, serve and partial-set indicators with calculation or coverage issues are withheld here pending upstream correction. Descriptive comparisons do not demonstrate predictive skill.